On the one hand, it seems they've served their purpose, and the real estate eventually should feel the tug of market forces. (Why should retired people pay 1/2 market rent in Stuyvesant and own a second home in Florida, while young people struggling to make it in the city pay much more for a smaller apartment?) On the other hand, I see some legitimacy to the protection of poor folks and those on fixed incomes, which is provided by rent stabilization. It's a complex social and economic issue.
My favorite part of the issue, however, is this photograph which appeared in "AM New York: Manhattan's Largest Circulation". The paper is popular only because they hand it out free at subway stations, not because of the thoughtfulness or scope of its writing, and certainly not because of its journalistic integrity.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60a7d/60a7d1ba8a9909fbb1851f16a98e03a3a86b0d77" alt=""
Need I explain the humor in this picture? Clearly they wanted a shot of a Stuy resident, but why only half his face? And this is no passerby. He is Samuel Lichtenberg, 80, a long-time resident. Thanks for the smile, AM New York!
1 comment:
I like the picture. It's artistic because you have the young--the tricycler in the background--and the old---the man being moved out of the picture by being only half-involved.
Post a Comment